The gateway enforces authentication, but backend services still feel exposed.There are assumptions that the gateway is handling everything.I’m unsure whether additional security checks are needed internally.?
Decode Trail Latest Questions
The firewall rule exists and looks correct, but traffic still reaches the service.There are no obvious misconfigurations, yet enforcement doesn’t match expectations.I’m trying to understand whether this is a rule priority issue or something else.
All traffic is now encrypted using HTTPS, and certificates are configured correctly.Even so, security tools and reviews continue to report application-level issues.I thought HTTPS would handle most security concerns, so I’m confused about what’s still missing. What else ...
Early gains were easy, but progress has slowed significantly.Most basic controls are already in place.I’m trying to understand how teams continue improving beyond this point.
Zero trust controls are in place, yet security incidents still occur.This feels contradictory to what zero trust promises.I’m trying to understand what zero trust protects against and what it doesn’t.
MFA is enabled, yet compromises still happen.This feels counterintuitive given how strongly MFA is recommended.I’m trying to understand what threats MFA doesn’t cover.
Security controls are technically sound, but teams push back.Workflows feel slower and more restrictive.I’m trying to understand how organizations manage this transition successfully.
I was told that zero trust removes the need for traditional network security.However, I still see recommendations for segmentation and firewall rules.I’m trying to understand why network controls are still needed in a zero-trust setup.