Home/Nicolas/Answers
  1. Asked: January 3, 2026In:

    How can monitoring only accuracy hide serious model issues?

    Nicolas
    Nicolas Begginer

    Accuracy masks class imbalance, confidence collapse, and user impact. A model can maintain accuracy while becoming overly uncertain or biased toward majority classes. Secondary metrics reveal these issues earlier. Track precision, recall, calibration, and input drift alongside accuracy. Common mistaRead more

    Accuracy masks class imbalance, confidence collapse, and user impact.

    A model can maintain accuracy while becoming overly uncertain or biased toward majority classes. Secondary metrics reveal these issues earlier.

    Track precision, recall, calibration, and input drift alongside accuracy.

    Common mistakes:

    • Single-metric dashboards

    • Ignoring prediction confidence

    • No slice-based evaluation

    Good monitoring is multi-dimensional.

    See less
  2. Asked: January 3, 2026In:

    How do I validate that my retraining pipeline is safe?

    Nicolas
    Nicolas Begginer

    Run shadow training and compare outputs before deployment.Train the new model without serving it and compare predictions against the current model on live traffic. Large unexplained deviations are red flags. Automate validation checks and require manual approval for major shifts. Common mistakes: BlRead more

    Run shadow training and compare outputs before deployment.Train the new model without serving it and compare predictions against the current model on live traffic. Large unexplained deviations are red flags.

    Automate validation checks and require manual approval for major shifts.

    Common mistakes:

    1. Blind retraining schedules

    2. No regression testing

    3. Treating retraining as routine

    Automation needs safeguards.

    See less
  3. Asked: January 3, 2026In:

    How do I know when to retrain versus fine-tune?

    Nicolas
    Nicolas Begginer

    Retrain when the data distribution changes significantly; fine-tune when behavior needs adjustment. If core patterns shift, fine-tuning may not be enough. If the task remains similar but requirements evolve, fine-tuning is more efficient. Evaluate both paths on a validation set before committing. CoRead more

    Retrain when the data distribution changes significantly; fine-tune when behavior needs adjustment.

    If core patterns shift, fine-tuning may not be enough. If the task remains similar but requirements evolve, fine-tuning is more efficient.

    Evaluate both paths on a validation set before committing.

    Common mistakes:

    1. Fine-tuning outdated models

    2. Retraining unnecessarily

    3. Ignoring data diagnostics

    Choose the strategy that matches the change.

    See less
  4. Asked: January 3, 2026In:

    How can feature scaling differences silently break a retrained model?

    Nicolas
    Nicolas Begginer

    If scaling parameters change between training runs, the model may receive inputs in a completely different range than expected. This often happens when scalers are refit during retraining instead of reused, or when training and inference pipelines compute statistics differently. The model still runsRead more

    If scaling parameters change between training runs, the model may receive inputs in a completely different range than expected.

    This often happens when scalers are refit during retraining instead of reused, or when training and inference pipelines compute statistics differently. The model still runs, but its learned weights no longer align with the input distribution.Always persist and version feature scalers alongside the model, or recompute them using a strictly defined window. For tree-based models this matters less, but for linear models and neural networks it’s critical.

    Common mistakes:

    1. Recomputing normalization on partial datasets

    2. Applying per-batch scaling during inference

    3. Assuming scaling is “harmless” preprocessing

    Feature scaling is part of the model contract.

    See less
  5. Asked: January 3, 2026In:

    How do I detect when my model is learning spurious correlations?

    Nicolas
    Nicolas Begginer

    Spurious correlations show up when a model performs well in validation but fails under slight input changes.This happens when the model latches onto shortcuts in the data—background artifacts, metadata, or proxy features—rather than the true signal. You’ll often see brittle behavior when conditionsRead more

    Spurious correlations show up when a model performs well in validation but fails under slight input changes.This happens when the model latches onto shortcuts in the data—background artifacts, metadata, or proxy features—rather than the true signal.

    You’ll often see brittle behavior when conditions change.Use counterfactual testing: modify or remove suspected features and observe prediction changes. Training with more diverse data and applying regularization also helps reduce shortcut learning.

    Common mistakes:

    1. Trusting aggregate metrics without stress tests

    2. Training on overly clean or curated datasets

    3. Ignoring feature importance analysis

    Robust models should fail gracefully, not catastrophically.

    See less